NFL - More Betting
NFL 2020 Detroit Lions vs. Jacksonville Jaguars: Predictions, picks and bets
Predictions based on 10,000+ simulations
The Jaguars will carry their four-game losing streak when they host the well-rested Detroit Lions.
Jacksonville will hope to capitalize on a weakened Detroit defensive backfield that has been a happy hunting ground for opposition quarterbacks.
FREE-TO-PLAY: Win $1K on this week's NFL
Meanwhile, the Lions will be hoping the Jags sacking woes continue with Jacksonville going at an awful 1 sack-per-game, the lowest in the NFL in 2020.
All the best Week 6 NFL promos here!
RELATED: 5 Step Guide to Online Betting
💪 Spread
The Jaguars are 2-3 against the spread whilst the Lions aren’t going any better at 1-3 so far. DimersBOT is crunching the numbers to ensure you get the latest probabilities.
INSANE OFFER: Bet $1, get $100 if either team scores a TD. Find out how here!
Get a risk-free $500 bet with FanDuel
🚀 Over/Under
Jacksonville’s games have hit the Over points total in ⅗ of their games whilst Detroit are boasting a healthy 3/4 when going at the Over. If the Over/Under is still sitting at mid-50s when you’re making your play it might be wise to continue with this trend, however this seems a little high. Here’s what our data suggests.
💵 Moneyline
Our model likes Detroit for the win, but their injured defense ranks last in the league for rushing defense and they’ll need their offense to pick up that slack if they’re to please bettors who tail this pick.
Keen to jump on the Over/Under market? Use code DIMERS500 when you join William Hill and get a free bet worth up to $500 on your first deposit!
🏈 Dimers' take-out
Gardner Minshew and the Jags really need to capitalize on this Lions defense if they’re to be considered a chance but our model is suggesting a day out for Matt Stafford and the gang to reign supreme. If you also want to reign supreme, check out our best NFL promos for this week, here, make it RAIN.
Read our comprehensive online sportsbook reviews here.
*Odds and probabilities correct at time of publishing.